Feb. 20, 2006: Why are PPS School Board members attending seminars at a right wing think tank?

Tags:

Visit our new website: www.neighborhoodschoolsalliance.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE — Feb. 20, 2006

Why are PPS School Board members attending seminars at a right-wing think tank?

This is the second time in a year that our Board members have been “trained” by the Broad Foundation—a right-wing group that promotes school privatization and charters

Disturbing pattern developing as Portland Schools Foundation promotes interactions with right-wing think tanks and their agendas

NSA To School Board Members: Please sever ties with the Broad Foundation!

CONTACTS: SW-Lynn Schore and Steve Linder, 503-245-0870; SW-Ruth Adkins, 503-977-2933, SE-Anne Trudeau, 503-228-6384.

Portland, OR – The Portland School Board has cancelled their February 27 meeting so that board members can attend a Broad Foundation seminar. Not only do we question the timing of this retreat in the midst of a funding crisis: NSA is disturbed by the pattern of our school board’s attendance at this right-wing think tank’s “training” sessions, as well as the influence of right-wing think tanks in the recent Jefferson redesign process.

The Broad Foundation—reactionary and right-wing, pro-privatization and pro-charters—
is insinuating its agenda into our school district. We urge the School Board to:

· Cancel the upcoming training
· Sever their connection with the Broad Foundation
· Take a hard look at the Jefferson redesign process

What is the harm in our volunteer board taking advantage of professional development opportunities? The problem is that the Broad Foundation has a specific agenda:

· The Broad Foundation and other reactionary think tanks hail high-stakes testing because it is "data driven" — but THEY get to select the data, determine how it is used, and how hard to drive students and parents.
· Broad takes the worst of corporate management models — a GM-style, top-down, CEO-driven business model — and applies it to public education. The School Board is charged with representing the citizens of Portland, not the corporate profit-driven Broad Foundation of Los Angeles, which treats children like business capital.
· One of Broad's stated goals is privatization. Broad advocates for privatization and reform schemes to create more "knowledge workers" for corporations.
· Broad promotes charter schools.

This insidious push toward privatization and charters, advocated by the Broad Foundation, is the wrong direction for a progressive town like Portland. We need our Board members here at home, to craft solutions to our current funding crisis and to lobby in Salem. The destruction of our public schools by the Bush Administration and right-wing groups has already begun – we don't need to train our local School Board to better foster the privatization process.

Broad Foundation—reactionary and right-wing, the WRONG direction for Portland

· Established in 1999, the Broad (rhymes with "Load") Foundation began as a $400 million venue for Los Angeles billionaire Eli Broad. Education News calls Broad a "philanthropist with privatization lesson plans."
· Broad attempts to reform urban public schools through corporate-trained leadership, using mayoral and school board take-overs.
· A major Broad treatise is entitled: "Public Education Needs: A – More Money. B – Better Teachers. C - Privatization."
· Seeking to "reform" K-12 education, Broad supports creating a workforce of so-called "knowledge workers." (The charge of Portland Public Schools is to create knowledgeable citizens — not corporate drones.)
· The Broad Foundation promotes charter schools. Broad-trained School Board members recently approved two new charter schools.
· Laura Bush's previous press secretary, Noelia Rodriguez, is Chief of Staff to Broad, and serves as Director of External Affairs for the Broad Foundation.
· Eli Broad has stated: "Charter schools, private schools, Edison schools, parochial schools and opportunity scholarships all provide healthy competition to our K-12 public school system. I support rapidly increasing the number of seats available outside of our public school system … in line with the third school of thought – that we must focus our attention and resources on reforming and reinvigorating the public school system itself."
· Broad's "heroes" and "leading lights" include President Bush's first-term Secretary of Education Rod Paige. This is the man who referred to the national teachers union as “terrorists.”

Disturbing pattern of growing influence within PPS

· This is the second time within a year that PPS board members have attended a Broad Foundation seminar. At the 7/6/05 school board meeting, Director Regan and three new school board members (Henning, Ryan, Sargent) discussed their attendance at a weeklong Broad Institute training for school board members.
· A Portland Schools Foundation (PSF) document notes "PSF leadership helped recruit three of the new board members and connected the school board with the Broad Institute for vital training and support."
· Soon after the Broad training session, the new School Board members (all of whose campaigns were bankrolled by Portland Schools Foundation) voted to approve new charter schools in Portland.
· Broad “Fellows” are currently involved in public high school reform in Portland, and will work on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation "Secondary Level Transformation Initiative Grant" for Jefferson. (This grant was obtained last week by NSA pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act Request to the Portland Schools Foundation.)
· PPS and the Portland Schools Foundation documented their support for charters and school "governance models" in the Gates grant, without the input or knowledge of the public.
· Broad also supports KIPP schools, touted as successful school models in two books, both entitled No Excuses, by the right-wing think tanks the Heritage Foundation and Manhattan Institute.
· The Jefferson Design Team recently visited two KIPP schools in Houston and New York. In her compelling 1/23/06 statement to the School Board, Jefferson High School PTSA President Glenda Walker called into question the validity of the design team process, calling the process "dishonest, and orchestrated, with predetermined outcomes.”

PPS's customers have NOT asked the School Board to participate in right-wing seminars! PPS must finally put its customers in direct contact with the people who actually run the PPS organization. Whether that is the School Board or the Portland Schools Foundation, NSA insists we pop the bubble that the Superintendent, Board, and Portland Schools Foundation exist in --- insulated from meaningful customer contact by a lack of democratic process.

NSA stands ready to join with parents, students, educators, grassroots groups and our Board to fight the high-stakes testing juggernaut. We stand against “philanthropic” foundations like Broad and similar groups who are privatizing our public schools in the name of testing and No Child Left Behind.

Read more about the Broad Foundation

· Broad's "Public Education Needs … Privatization" treatise:
http://www.broadfoundation.org/brochure/tbf_brochure.pdf
· For analysis of Eli Broad and the Broad Foundation, see the Data Center's Youth Strategy Project's excellent analysis of school takeovers in Oakland and other California cities: http://datacenter.org/research/oaklandtakeover.pdf .
· "Philanthropists with privatizations lesson plans," Education News:
http://www.educationnews.org/writers/daniel/philanthropists-with-privati...
· A 12/05 editorial in Substance: The Newspaper of Public Education in Chicago discussed the "union-busting, teacher-bashing Broad" in relation to Mayor Daley's "privatization, militarization, and charterization schemes":
http://www.substancenews.com/Mambo/content/view/327/84/
· From 1989 to 1997, a powerful group of CEOs called the Business Roundtable became enamored of education reform theories that feed the growing service economy. They have locked into this model, creating an elaborate network of corporate educational foundations that all work off of the same talking points (examples of these organizations, popular with the School Board, include the Broad Foundation, the Education Trust, Annenberg Institute, Harvard Graduate School of Education). In addition to this network, the national Business Roundtable organization instructed each of its state Business Roundtable affiliates to directly lobby state legislators to introduce and support high stakes testing reform. "High Stakes Testing and the New Tracking System" by Kathy Emery:
http://www.educationanddemocracy.org/Emery/Emery_NewTracking.htm
· Why Is Corporate America Bashing Our Schools?, written by Kathy Emery and Susan Ohanian. See Amazon reviews.
· Portland Schools Foundation sends 3 new Board members for Broad training: http://www.annenberginstitute.org/EKF/images/pdfs/Context_Portland.pdf

The Neighborhood Schools Alliance (NSA) is a diverse group of parents, teachers, and community members from all areas of Portland working together to support and strengthen our neighborhood schools. We believe that our neighborhood schools are the heart and soul of a livable community and that all children deserve a high-quality school in their neighborhood.

For more information on NSA, visit www.neighborhoodschoolsalliance

Submitted by: Toussaint – Mon, 02/20/2006 – 2:27pm

Broad Institute is not right-wing think tank

This notice from the NSA is off-base. Four members of the Portland School Board will be out of town over the coming weekend to attend the Broad Institute for School Boards’ Alumni Retreat, where we will have the opportunity to discuss school reform with many colleagues from urban districts across the country. [No PPS funds are expended on this trip.]

The Broad Institute is not a right-wing think tank – it’s a training program focused on promoting improved governance by school boards. The focus is not on specific policies but on the process of governing and becoming an effective board. Some attendees and some faculty may believe that charters and privatization are important elements in improving education for their community; many do not. Indeed at the event last year, the most spirited debate concerned the role of charter schools and the “side” opposing promotion of charters as a strategic element was led by Portland School Board members. In Oregon, state law provides the governing framework for charter schools and PPS is bound to follow the law. In addition to approving two new charter schools (by a split vote) the PPS Board also recently denied three other applications.

There is one exception to this policy neutral stance of Broad – eliminating the achievement gap for poor and minority students is at the heart of all of the conversations.

“There is no more important contribution to our nation's future than a determined, long-term commitment to improve public education”

“Public education is the key civil rights issue of the 21st century”

“I oppose the large-scale use of publicly funded vouchers”

“We must focus our attention and resources on reforming and reinvigorating the public school system itself”

Does this sound like a right-wing think tank? These are the words of Eli Broad in the mission statement for the Broad Foundation’s education programs. Read the whole statement at http://www.broadfoundation.org/about/index.shtml

Here’s what Eli Broad says about competition in context:

“Although I support many forms of public school competition, I believe these programs simply cannot grow at the pace and scale necessary to meet the needs of children in the 21st century. Over the next decade, four out of five children in America will continue to be educated in public schools. Therefore, where I come out is in line with the third school of thought – that we must focus our attention and resources on reforming and reinvigorating the public school system itself.”

Yes, Broad lists Rod Paige as one of its heroes, but it also lists teachers union leader Adam Urbanski too (http://www.broadfoundation.org/heroes/index.shtml).

The truth is that Broad is concerned with all of the same issues that the Portland School Board, the NSA, and many in Portland are. Across the country many dedicated folks are looking for the best way to improve schools for their community. That’s what we’re doing too. The Broad Foundation offers a far more diverse perspective on improving public education than you would expect from the selective presentation in this NSA commentary.

Broad does have an agenda.

David,

Thank you very much for posting on our website. We hope you and other school board members will come back and visit often!

While we can understand the attraction to board members for attending the Broad trainings/retreats, we are deeply concerned about PPS being associated with Broad. NSA is not accusing our hard-working volunteer board members of malfeasance--we are sounding the alarm and asking the board to distance itself and PPS from this organization.

It is a fact that Broad is pro-charter, anti-union, and very pro-privatization. Broad is insidious because they couch their ideology in progressive terms. "Improvement", "reform" and "reinvigoration" sound good, but the mechanisms and end goals Broad supports are not progressive. "Governance," for example, tends to mean a private takeover of a public school.

As for "eliminating the achievement gap for poor and minority students [being] at the heart of all of the conversations"--the Bush Administration and No Child Left Behind say the same thing.

Broad may seem "policy neutral" when they are providing you with a pleasant, stimulating (and well-deserved) retreat weekend, but the ongoing association with this organization puts PPS at risk of coming under their sway--if not directly then in subtle ways. (For instance, it may be merely a coincidence that the board members who attended the Broad training last summer are the same ones who supported the two charters that got approved--but how do we know?) More directly, what is the role of the "Broad Fellows" who are mentioned in the Gates grant?

You mentioned that a teachers union leader is also on the Broad "heroes" list and suggest we are being selective in our depiction. For the sake of providing an accurate picture of Broad's views and priorities, below is the complete list of the "heroes" from the Broad website.

Please take a few minutes to read through this list; the themes of charters, privatization, high-stakes testing, and top-down management are pervasive.

Is this list of Broad's "heroes," and the priorities it reveals, in line with Portland's values and vision for its public schools? We think not.

Thank you,

Ruth Adkins

    Broad Hero #1:

Rod Paige (teachers union=terrorists); also the Houston scandal of fabricating dropout statistics: "Houston's 'Zero Dropout'" http://www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bushplan/drop181shtml

    Broad Hero #2:

Aspire's Hybrid Team: "Aspire Public Schools, the growing California-based, nonprofit charter management organization, is reshaping local public school systems in California under the leadership of Don Shalvey, Gloria Lee and Elise Darwish."

Here is an admiring description of Aspire's rapidly expanding charter empire: "If Aspire succeeds in its goal of 100 charter schools in 10 years, it will be the 14th largest school district in California, giving it the leverage it needs to frame the debate about education reform, serve as a role model for local school systems, and have a direct impact on students and local school districts." http://www.ashoka.org/fellows/viewprofile3.cfm?reid=97577

    Broad Hero #3:

"Dynamic Duo Taking a Stand in San Diego" -- Alan Bersin and Tony Alvarado.

Here is one view of their tenure: "The San Diego Unified School District “Blueprint for Success” is Dead!" From the very inception of this plan the Blueprint was a quagmire of problems, obstacles, dissension, and disconnect with the parents, in particular Hispanic parents, teachers, administrators, and with the citizens and residents of the San Diego Unified School District. http://www.laprensa-sandiego.org/archieve/july09-04/blue.htm

    Broad Hero #4:

Boston superintendent Thomas W. Payzant -- Under this team of leadership, the School Committee also negotiated a groundbreaking three-year contract with the Boston Teachers Union that supports pilot schools, high school restructuring and improved teacher accountability and evaluation. ["Groundbreaking"? Sounds like union-busting] It opened 11 in-district charter schools...

    Broad Hero #5:

Teachers union reformer Adam Urbanski--The Broad Foundation is an enthusiastic supporter of TURN's efforts to create collective bargaining agreements that center around student achievement and reward performance instead of simply dealing with work rules, salaries and grievance procedures.

Urbanski has an article called "Reform or Be Reformed" in a publication of the Hoover Institution--which by any measure, is a right-wing think tank. http://www.educationnext.org/20013/38urbanski.html

    Broad Hero #6:

New Leaders for New Schools -- dedicated to recruiting, training, placing and supporting public and charter school principals in urban schools across the country. Launched in 2001, New Leaders for New Schools aims to train and place up to 2,500 new principals over the coming decade.

    Broad Hero #7:

Houston Superintendent Sets the Bar for Excellence--Kaye Stripling. Stripling was the successor to the infamous Rod Paige and carried on his legacy of top-down management and high-stakes testing along with with questionable statistical reporting.

    Broad Hero #8:

Former Colorado Governor Roy Romer, Superintendent of Los Angeles Unified School District. He is also committed to improving teacher training, altering the school day and school year to maximize the learning opportunity for each child, encouraging parents to actively participate in the education of their children, increasing school choice by giving families access to charters and other public schools that work and reducing class size.... And in googling one finds "LA School District Superintendent Roy Romer Seeks Counsel of Hoover fellows"--http://www.hoover.org/pubaffairs/newsletter/01winter/romer.html --another case of well-meaning administrators getting sucked into the conservative agenda?

National schools expert/activist Jonathan Kozol, author of “The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America,” had this to say about Roy Romer in a Sept. 2005 speech in Portland:

I knew the Superintendent of the Los Angeles schools. I've known all these guys for years. But boy, I don't see how he can sleep at night. I don't mean to make thes ad hominem, but his name is Roy Romer and I don't see how he can sleep at night. I don't think he ought to be able to sleep well at night." Kozol goes on to talk about brilliant Black kids that he met in LA in 2005, who were being forced to take sewing and hair-dressing courses: "I thought, surely they don't do that any more. There it is in Los Angeles today. That is why I am so mad at the superintendent there. His name is Roy Romer. Did I say that before? I am just furious with him."

    Broad Hero #9

Sacramento's Legacy - Supt. Jim Sweeney. Sweeney did raise test scores. Here is a local news story: "Sacramento Schools Superintendent Resigns”: Sweeney leaves as the district is again facing tough times. Angry teachers are trying to decide whether to strike in the fall. Parents are upset about Sacramento High School being closed and then re-opened as a charter school. Some parents have called for a grand jury investigation into the district's finances. http://www.news10.net/storyfull.asp?id=4564

    Broad Hero #10

Seasoned Educator Makes High Marks in Atlanta - Supt. Beverly Hall. Hall also increased test scores. Can't resist this nugget from 2003: U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige today joined Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue, Atlanta Public Schools Superintendent Beverly Hall, students, educators and other community partners to kick off the "No Child Left Behind Summer Reading Achievers" program for students in Atlanta Public Schools. ...Students who participate will receive an embossed "No Child Left Behind Summer Reading Achiever" certificate signed by the Secretary Paige and Superintendent Hall." http://www.susanohanian.org/outrage_fetch.php?id=24

    Broad Hero #11

Setting Standards, Transforming Leadership -- Marc Tucker and Judy Codding, National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE). This outfit appears to be all about high-stakes testing and corporate-model school leadership. "They argued that the role of principals has changed dramatically in the United States, having created a need for professional training for principals. They advise that this training be similar to an executive development program in a business school rather than a current masters degree program in an education administration school."

    Broad Hero #12

Trio's teamwork boosts teacher salaries in Denver- Superintendent Jerry Wartgow, School Board President Elaine Gantz Berman and Denver Classroom Teachers Association (DCTA) President Becky Wissink worked together to establish the Joint Task Force on Teacher Compensation, the entity that then implemented Denver's Pay for Performance Pilot. This merit pay program shows up in yet another Hoover Institution article: http://www.educationnext.org/20051/10.html

    Broad Hero #13

Venture Philanthropist Increases Options for Children- Kim Smith, New Schools Venture Fund (NewSchools), a nonprofit venture philanthropy fund that improves public schools by supporting education entrepreneurs. ... The Broad Foundation currently supports NewSchools' Charter Accelerator Fund, a $30 million fund focused on fueling rapid, scalable growth of nonprofit charter systems in key areas ripe for reform.

From the NY Times: "The companies they form are nonprofit charter school management organizations, capable of running publicly financed elementary and secondary schools that are freed from some rules and regulations in exchange for producing educational results better than those of the large urban school district. Almost all their students are eligible for free or reduced-price breakfasts and lunches.... Financing from New Schools and charitable foundations helps them to build or buy school properties and to get elementary, middle and high schools up and running. But their operations are expected to quickly become self-sustaining on the stipends paid from local, state and federal taxes for educating each student."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/16/business/16sbiz.html

Broad Institute

David, just this once I think it would be in your interest to open your ears (and eyes) to well-intended criticism before you so vociferously defend an entity you know very little about.

Hat in hand, this Board and Superintendent are scouring the countryside for grant money to help fill funding gaps. While this effort cannot be faulted per se, even you must admit it has the potential to create conflicts and uneasy bedfellows. The last thing you want is to see your strategies and goals hijacked by a private foundation that now has funding authority over your enterprise.

Whether or not the Broad Foundation (or the Gates Foundation for that matter) is a right-wing entity set on privatizing public schools, you need to be sensitive to the issue of public concern about private grant money in our public school system. Your comments above do not reflect that sensitivity.

I trust you will agree that the Bush Administration is a vocal advocate of charter schools and vouchers. Your constituents are opposed to these right-wing initiatives and would be alarmed to see you accept funds from foundations that support them.

For a balanced view of the Broad Foundation, please see the following link:

http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/19_04/who194.shtml

Best regards,

Mike Miller

Broad Institute

The fact that George W. Bush praised the Broad Foundation for its efforts"to help the nation's schools meet the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act" is evidence enough for me that Broad is far enough to the right to warrant the NSA's press release and to justify its demand that the board "sever" its ties to the foundation. Read my complete remarks about the Broad Foundation here: http://joesschool.blogs.com/olsononline/2006/02/portland_school.html

I further question the role of the Portland Schools Foundation in connecting the Portland School Board with the Broad Foundation. http://joesschool.blogs.com/olsononline/2006/02/more_on_the_bro.html

It raises the troubling issue of who's actually running the district - our elected representatives, or the wealthy and well-connected elite who serve on PSF's board.